| |
|
DATE |
QUESTION |
YES% |
NO% |
DO NOT KNOW% |
| Fri
01/12/2006 |
It has been announced that smoking in
public places will be banned in England from 1 July next year.
Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt said
the ban was a "huge step forward".
Chief executive of the British Lung
Foundation Dame Helena Shovelton, said: "This is a victory for all those of us
who have campaigned so vigorously to improve public health."
Simon Clark, director of the smokers'
lobby group Forest, said that decision had been "draconian. "From July
next year it will not only be illegal to smoke in every pub, club and bar in the
country, it will also be impossible to set up a private club run by smokers for
smokers," he said. "That's an amazing state of affairs but typical of a
government that seems determined to interfere in every aspect of our daily
lives."
Patricia Hewitt is to launch a £50m
Smoke-free England campaign, to advise England's 3.7m businesses to prepare for
the ban.
q.
Should the government be allowed to spend
£50m of our money on a campaign we already know about?
|
9 |
91 |
0 |
| Mon
04/12/2006 |
National toll roads are set to be
introduced by the year 2016. The number of vehicles on British roads had
gone up from 26 million in 1997 to 33 million.
Last week a transport study suggested
road charges could halve congestion.
Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander
has said: "Drivers needed first-hand experience of road pricing through
pilot schemes in Manchester, Birmingham and elsewhere within the next five
years,
Shadow chancellor George Osbourne said
the Conservatives were "sympathetic" to road pricing. Mr Osbourne added:
"I think road pricing should be linked directly to improvements in transport
infrastructure and should not be used as an excuse to increase the overall level
of taxation."
q.
Should we have National Toll roads?
|
33 |
55 |
12 |
| Tue
05/12/2006 |
The Institute for Public Policy
Research (IPPR) said a move away from local A&E departments to specialist
medical care units could prevent more than 1,000 unnecessary deaths each year.
The IPPR fear that campaigns to stop the closure of local A&E departments could
prevent those 1000 lives from being saved.
Andrew Lansley, the shadow health
secretary, said the changes were all about saving money. Conservatives
have compiled of list of 29 A&E services that are under threat. They say
seven out of ten trusts proposing downgrades made a loss last year. The
government insisted that changing to specialist medical care units will make
services safer and more up-to-date and that the move is not financially driven.
The government's emergency access
advisor, Professor Sir George Alberti, said : "I have no trouble with that
concept at all because for example if my aorta is beginning to rupture I want to
see a vascular surgeon, who is experienced at doing that operation. "Now
if it takes 20 minutes longer to get there so be it. And the same goes now
for heart attacks, for strokes, you need to be at a specialist unit."
q.
Would you prefer to have
specialist medical care
units, even if it means you have to travel further?
|
29 |
67 |
4 |
| Wed 06/12/2006 |
In the past two years the following crimes were committed
by former prisoners who were supposed to be under supervision after being
released early on licence:
David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, said: "This is a
shocking indictment of Government failure across the board to protect the
public. How much longer must the public pay the often lethal price of this
failure?"
The Home Office argued that only 0.2 per cent (448) of
offenders being supervised were convicted of a serious violent or sexual offence
in any one year.
The 2005 Offender Management Statistics disclosed that the
period of imprisonment served by criminals handed a discretionary life term fell
from nine years in 2004 to six years last year.
The statistics discovered that, in England and Wales, 144
of every 100,000 of the population were in custody,
The figures for 2005 show that 224,090 offenders were
being supervised by the probation service, a rise of seven per cent over the
previous year.
Assistant general secretary of the probation union Napo,
Harry Fletcher, said the rise in offences committed by people on parole could be
due to an increase in the number of people released early from prison. "The
government must ensure that the Probation Service is fully resourced in order to
minimise the chances of serious re-offending in the future."
q.
Should
those convicted of a serious
violent or sexual offence be considered for early release
on licence?
|
0 |
98 |
2 |
| Thur 07/12/2006 |
Of the 3,500 Asbos (Antisocial behaviour orders) handed
out in England and Wales in 2004-05 (a 60 per cent rise on the figures for
2003-2004) 55% are broken.
Each Asbo issued costs the tax payer £3100, which means,
of the £10,850,000 spent on Asbo administration £5,967,500 is being wasted.
The NAO (National Audit Office) questions the
effectiveness of the policy, saying that more than half of all antisocial
behaviour is carried out by: "a hard core of perpetrators for whom interventions
had limited impact". The NAO figures show that the average offender breaks
the conditions of their Asbo four times, with one offender breaking the
conditions of his order 25 times."
The chairman of the Commons
Public Accounts Committee, Edward Leigh, said:
"Instead of being startled into bringing their
behaviour into check, too often offenders respond to
an Asbo by sneering at the authorities and continue
to make life miserable for the rest of their
community. We're not talking about high jinks from a
few mischievous youngsters. We're talking about yobs
whose persistent criminal activity and intimidation
are making our city centres no-go areas."
Home Office minister Tony
McNulty said: "Where breaches are reported it means
that individuals are being monitored, that
communities feel confident enough to report them
and, let's be clear, if an offender breaches his or
her order, there will be serious consequences, and
rightly so. People can't have it both ways,
accusing us of criminalising a whole generation and
throwing Asbos down like confetti - which we aren't
doing - and also being soft."
q.
Would it be better if those who
persistently carry out acts of antisocial behaviour, receive a
period in prison or a Young Offender
Institution?
|
83 |
11 |
6 |
| Fri 08/12/2006 |
Ruth Kelly, the Cabinet minister responsible for equality, is said to be at odds
with Peter Hain, the Northern Ireland Secretary.
The rift is due to Mr Hain pushing through regulations in the province outlawing
discrimination against gays, lesbians and bisexuals.
The regulations which take effect in Northern Ireland on 1 January, are tougher
than Ms Kelly’s plans for England, Wales and Scotland.
Mr Hain has defied a call by Ms Kelly to hold fire until a common approach has
been agreed.
Gay rights campaigners are urging Ms Kelly to extend the Northern Ireland rules
to the rest of the UK, but church leaders are urging ministers not to put the
rights of gays above the rights of Christians.
Colin Hart, director of the Christian Institute said: "Peter Hain talks about
equality. But he should read his own regulations, which elevate gay rights above
all other rights for religious people, and rights on the grounds of age, sex and
disability. It is a preferential status which will drive a coach and horses
through religious liberty."
The new Commission for Equality and Human Rights will have the power to
intervene without receiving a complaint of discrimination.
Anglican and Catholic churches could be sued if their bookshops refuse to stock
gay literature and hotel owners with strong religious beliefs could be fined if
they do not allow gay couples to share a room.
q.
Should
England, Wales and Scotland adopt the same tough regulations outlawing
discrimination as those set to be implemented in Northern Ireland?
|
29 |
63 |
8 |
| Mon 11/12/2006 |
Following intense pressure from the Media and victims of
crime, Home Secretary John Reid has promised 8,000 extra prison places. Mr Ried
announced that he wants to scrap rules allowing violent criminals serving life
sentences to apply for parole half way through, he also wants to stop automatic
one-third discounts for people who plead guilty.
The conservatives have welcomed the overhaul, but criticised the government for
not providing extra prison places in the past.
Mr Reid said: "Too often it appears that the criminal justice system is on the
side of offenders, protecting their interest and individual rights rather than
those of the victims and law-abiding majority".
President of the Association of Chief Police Officers, Ken Jones, said "tough
sentences could deter criminals."
Liberal Democrat spokesman Nick Clegg was critical of the proposed measures
saying: "We will only secure a manageable prison
population if we take a bolder
approach to tackling reoffending, with non-custodial public punishment sentences
and proper mental health treatment."
q.
Do you believe that the Home Secretary's plan to overhaul the sentencing
system is the correct way to go?
|
79 |
17 |
4 |
| Tue 12/12/2006 |
With the announcement that absent parents are to be "named
and shamed", many have been critical as to the effectiveness of the policy.
Chris Stanley, head of policy and research at crime
reduction charity Nacro points to the use of Asbos.
Mr Stanley said: "We don't think naming and shaming can be
considered productive from a children's rights perspective. There's also
the issue of some young people who have never done anything successful holding
up a leaflet publicising their Asbo and saying to their friends 'I did that';
almost like it's a badge of honour."
Many now believe we live in a shameless society.
Professor Bernice Andrews, of Royal Holloway University of
London said:" These days people are likely to feel more shame about what they
look like or their material success rather than any offence they may commit.
Some people are just shameless. They are usually people who don't feel empathy
or regret. They may simply want recognition and actually enjoy being in the
public eye. It only works if people care what others think of them."
q.
Do you believe a
"named and shamed" policy should be used to prevent crime?
|
69 |
13 |
18 |
| Wed 13/12/2006 |
Last week
Patricia Hewitt announced that the government
was to launch a
£50m Smoke-free England campaign. This was seen by many a waste of
money, telling the public about an issue that will be covered by the media.
Today the BBC reported that £100m of the tax
payers money is spent on translation services in the UK.
Local authorities spend £25m, NHS trusts £55m and the
courts £31m on interpreting languages.
.The
BBC discovered that Peterborough Council translates details of its refuse
collection service into 15 languages.
Islington's NHS primary care trust is providing a Turkish
woman who has been a UK resident for five years with one-to-one sessions to help
her stop smoking translated into her own language .
Phil Woolas, Communities Minister, said: "We believe that
the system may need to be rebalanced to give a greater focus on teaching English
and this includes looking at the advice given from government, public bodies and
local authorities."
The former head of the Commission for Racial Equality,
Trevor Phillips, said: "Translation is not a disincentive. It allows them to get
access to services while they learn English. Translation is a way of helping
people in transition into integrating into our society."
q.
Do you believe the public should have greater control of government
spending?
|
92 |
8 |
0 |
| Thur 14/12/2006 |
The government may have to give prisoners the right to vote, due to a ruling by
the European Court of Human Rights.
The ruling which found a ban on prisoners voting went against their human
rights, could allow prisoners to become part of the electorate for the first
time in our history.
Giving prisoners the vote will bring the current UK law (which dates back to the
Forfeiture Act of 1870) in line with the rest of western Europe.
Former Conservative home secretary Lord Douglas Hurd, Liberal Democrat president
Simon Hughes and Labour peer Baroness Kennedy QC support the Barred from Voting
group which has been set up by the Prison Reform Trust.
The group supporters say it is the "inalienable human right" for
prisoners to vote.
A
Strasbourg court ruled that not allowing prisoners to vote breached article
three of protocol one of the European convention on human rights, which
guarantees "free elections ... under conditions which will ensure the free
expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature".
The government argued that banning prisoners from
voting prevented crime and punished offenders to enhance civil responsibility
and respect for the rule of law.
q.
Do you believe prisoners should have the right to vote?
|
41 |
59 |
0 |
|
Mon 18/12/2006 |
A bill to reduce the time limit for abortions from the current 24 weeks to 20
weeks is to be proposed by Tory MP Nadine
Dorries.
Ms Dorries also calls for a one-week
"cooling-off" period following an abortion request to allow sufficient time for
counselling.
Announcing her proposal Ms Dorries said: "Many
people are not aware that in order for a late abortion to take place for social
reasons, foeticide must first take place; this process can take up to two days
and involves a lethal injection being administered into the foetal heart via a
cannular through the mother's abdominal wall. "When a doctor is sure the
foetal heart has stopped, the dead foetus is delivered on day two using forceps.
"How can it possibly be right that on one hospital ward we have doctors working
to save the life of a baby born at 22 weeks, yet on another a doctor is aborting
one of the same gestation?"
There were 186,400 abortions in England and Wales
last year, 89% were carried out before the woman was 13 weeks pregnant, with 67%
performed at under 10 weeks.
Labour MP Chris McCafferty has called the
cooling-off proposal "an attack on women's reproductive rights".
q.
Should the time limit for abortions be
reduced from 24 weeks to 20 weeks?
|
52 |
47 |
1 |
|
Wed 20/12/2006 |
Following the dropping of the corruption inquiry into a BAE arms deal with Saudi
Arabia, Mark Pietch of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development) said the organisation would seek an explanation from the government
about the decision.
Prof Pietch, who heads the bribery working group at the OECD said: "Obviously we
want to know from the UK what exactly happened and I don't want to jump to a
conclusion at the moment."
Lord Goldsmith told the BBC: "If you are faced with the reality of the situation
that there's going to be massive damage - not to jobs - but to national
security, our counter-terrorism capabilities, vital interests and against that
you have the prospect of a case which is going to go nowhere, then I think the
answer is you have to be realistic and bite the bullet."
Former minister for defence procurement, Lord Gilbert said: "It's a very very
difficult area, one man's bribe is another man's commission payment. You get
this sort of ambiguity in the world of commerce very frequently."
The Campaign Against the Arms Trade believes the government has contravened the
OECD convention against bribery and intends to seek a judicial review. The
Campaign's Spokesman Simon Hill, said: "We think we have a case because we think
the government has broken the law."
q.
Was the Serious Fraud Office right to
drop the corruption inquiry into the BAE arms deal with Saudi Arabia?
|
63 |
37 |
0 |
|
Wed 27/12/2006 |
High Court judge Mrs Justice Black is forcing the Home Office to bring a family
of deported asylum seekers back to Britain and pay them compensation at the
expense (tens of thousands of pounds) of the taxpayer.
John Reid has admitted that the family's mentally incapacitated son should not
have been deported with his appeal still pending, and has been ordered to pay
him £4,000 compensation for being held in detention for two days.
The
taxpayer will pay for the damages, the expense of finding the
family, flights back to Britain, accommodation, legal aid for the
son's appeal and the probable cost of a second deportation
operation.
Blair Gibbs of the TaxPayers' Alliance said: "For once
immigration officials have done what the public want by
processing this asylum case quickly and sending the
failed claimants back home. "But now we have to
put up with activist judges telling them they can't
repatriate individual family members because of human
rights law. "The politicians are ultimately to
blame for enshrining this human rights law in the first
place."
The Home Office said: "An unfortunate oversight in this
case led to the removal of this family which should not
have happened. "In such cases consideration is
given to bringing persons removed back to the UK and we
are taking steps to do so in this case in line with the
court judgment and for the outstanding appeal to be
heard. "If the individual's appeal is refused, he
and his family will be required to leave the UK
voluntarily or face enforced removal."
q.
Was
High Court judge Mrs Justice Black
right to force
John Reid to carry out her judgement at the expense of the taxpayer?
|
9 |
88 |
3 |
|
Sat 30/12/2006 |
Local authority tests carried out by the Liberal Democrats found 23% of pubs,
bars and off-licences in England and Wales are selling alcohol to underage
drinkers.
Between 2004 and 2005 there were 11,452 tests in which under-age people were
sent into pubs, bars and off-licences to make purchases. Of those
11,452 tests, 2,588 resulted in purchases by the under 18s.
Liberal Democrat local government spokesman Andrew Stunell the Liberal Democrat
local government spokesman said: "It is shocking that under-age children can so
easily buy alcohol. "As well as being illegal, it is grossly irresponsible
for pubs and shops to sell alcohol to under-age young people. "Teenagers
drinking illegally bought alcohol often take part in anti-social behaviour,
causing misery for many people in their community."
There were 7,500 under 18s treated for conditions like alcohol poisoning in
2004-5, a rise of 20% compared to the period 1999-2000.
The underage drink problem is increased by minors getting over 18s to buy
alcohol for them. The purchasers of the alcohol tend to be only 18 or 19,
supplying the drink to gain esteem amongst a younger group.
q.
Should the
age limit for purchasing alcohol in shops and off-licences be increased
to 21?
|
51 |
47 |
2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|