Sir Michael said: "In the past six years, the prime
minister has presided over a near-catastrophic decline
in defence spending. For fighting insurgencies
such as those in Afghanistan and Iraq we need rather
large numbers of soldiers on the ground, proper
protection and tactical mobility, including helicopters.
In return for being prepared to make the ultimate
sacrifice, our servicemen and women should expect to be
better supported by the country than they have been."
But he praised President Bush saying he "put his money
where his mouth was" by giving resources and support to
his troops.
An MoD spokesman said: "Defence spending has been
steadily increasing. Last year alone we spent more
than £700m on improvements to service housing, announced
the introduction of a new £2,240 operational bonus and
invested millions more in new equipment, including body
armour and armoured vehicles."
The Navy
Six destroyers and frigates and two other vessels are
expected to be mothballed, to save more than £250m.
Defence sources have disclosed that the armed forces
have been told to save more than £250m this year, and £1
billion by April 2008.
The MoD will also cancel the last two of the eight
Type-45 destroyers the navy was supposed to get to
replace the 15 major ships cut in 2004.
Conservative defence spokesman, Julian Lewis, said the
fresh cuts were “absolutely devastating stuff” and that
cutting the number of Type-45 destroyers would be
“catastrophic”.
“You can’t have a navy without ships. This government is
absolutely hell-bent on the destruction of the Royal
Navy.”
In the 19th century, the Royal Navy was as large as the
seven next biggest navies combined. At the start
of the 20th century the Royal Navy remained twice as
large as the US and German navies.
But the 2004 cuts reduced it to its smallest since
before Trafalgar in 1805, and there are suggestions that
Portsmouth Naval base may close as the Navy now requires
only two major bases.