DAILY REFERENDUM.CO.UK

HOME   ARCHIVE INDEX   BBC NEWS   WEATHER  POLITICAL LINKS

 
 
 
DATE QUESTION YES% NO% DO NOT KNOW%
Wed 01/11/2006

Professor Bob Hepple QC, chairman of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics is asking the public whether people not convicted of crime should have their details stored on the national DNA database.

Professor Alec Jeffreys the inventor of DNA fingerprinting is concerned that his invention is not being used in the interest of the public. Along with civil liberties groups Professor Jeffreys believes that innocent people should have their details removed from the DNA database. However victims’ support groups believe that innocent people have nothing to fear.

Prof Hepple said the main question was whether the UK would "become instead of a nation of citizens, a nation of suspects".

q.   Should innocent people have their details removed from the DNA database?

76 19 5
Thur 02/11/2006

The government's Information Commissioner Richard Thomas has said Britain is "waking up to a surveillance society that is already all around us,".  The Commissioner’s report points out that the UK currently has 4.2 million Closed Circuit TV cameras in operation.  These CCTV cameras are monitoring everything from our work rate, to our shopping habits and movements.

The report adds that surveillance is set to increase in the near future.  Dr David Murakami-Wood the report's co-writer has said the UK was "the most surveilled country".  While surveillance could help fight terrorism and crime, it could "intrude into our private space", he added.

q.    Should there be tighter controls on the implementation of surveillance systems?

81 13 6
Fri 03/11/2006

The UK fisheries minister Ben Bradshaw has said Britain's fish stocks could be virtually wiped out by 2048,

Scientists issued the warning on Thursday, which they say represents the biggest global environment challenge after global warming.

The UK fisheries minister ruled out a complete ban on cod fishing, saying a "zero catch" could mean "the end of all fishing in the UK"

Greenpeace campaigner Willie Mackenzie said fish and chips would be off the menu "within our lifetime" if action was not taken now to tackle the problem.

q.    Should there be tighter controls on the fishing of British waters by our neighbours?

68 23 9
Sat 04/11/2006

A recent BBC poll suggests that most people in north-east England now support some form of devolved power for the region.  Two years ago to the day, more than three-quarters of voters in a referendum rejected the government's plans for an elected regional assembly. 

In a poll for the BBC's Politics Show, 69 per cent of 750 adults surveyed in the area said they would like local control on issues such as transport.  However after the 2004 vote, more referendums on devolution are unlikely.

75 per cent of those who responded to the Mori poll for the Politics Show felt the North East was worse off than London, both financially and in how well it is represented in government.  More than half of the respondents said they did not get their fair share of national spending.

q.    Should there be referenda on devolved power and regional assemblies?

57 39 4
Mon 06/11/2006

Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. 

 

"There is still time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, if we take strong action now".   -  Sir Nicholas Stern

 

 The Stern review utilises the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001), along with more recent scientific studies. 

 The review claims that the evidence is now overwhelming: climate change is a serious global threat, and it demands an urgent global response. 

 Utilising data provided by formal economic models, the Review estimates that if action is not taken, the cost of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global GDP (Gross Domestic Product) each year.  If a wider range of risks is taken into account, the estimates could rise to 20% of GDP.

 However reducing greenhouse gas emissions would limit the impact to around 1% of global GDP each year. 

 Martin Livermore of the Scientific Alliance claims: The billions which this review says it is necessary to spend are likely to have little positive effect, and could be put to much better use in helping the world's poorest people to create better lives for themselves.

q.    Do you think that the Stern Report is a reasonable assessment of the risks posed by Climate Change?

17 64 19
Tue 07/11/2006

English Parliament.

Devolution has created a United Kingdom in which Scotland and Wales have national executives while England does not.

The Scottish Parliament has full executive powers independent of the UK in 75% of governance matters. No English MP has any voice at all in such matters as they affect Scotland.

Scottish MPs can both initiate and vote on Acts of Parliament concerning education and the NHS in England.

Constitutionally there are three sorts of people in the island of Great Britain. There are those who are Scottish and British, those who are Welsh and British and those who are just British.

At the moment there is no voice for England in any of the various institutions that help shape EU policy, the conduct of EU business, or the awarding of EU grants.

“There’s a possibility that a Scotsman is going to rule over me. A Scotsman who comes from a constituency where my member of parliament, who I elected, has no say whatsoever.”    Sir Michael Caine

q.    Should there be an English parliament?
92 7 1
Wed 08/11/2006

Opposition peers have backed down in their fight to stop "fast-track" extraditions to the US.  Claiming the current system was unfair, they argued it was easier for the US to extradite Britons than vice-versa.  This means that the US remains on the list of countries that do not need "prima facie" evidence to extradite from the UK. 

Home Secretary John Reid called the decision a "strong message in support of justice".  Mr Reid added - "This will bring real benefits to British victims of crime and help ensure that serious criminals will not be able to escape justice by hiding abroad."

The Liberal Democrats were fighting to re-instate a clause that ensured extradition to the US could not take place unless a judge deemed it to be "in the interest of justice" for the trial to take place abroad.

Without Conservative support the Liberal Democrat's proposal was defeated by 96 votes to 174.

The proposal followed controversy over the extradition of three UK bankers - the "NatWest Three" to the US on fraud charges.

q.    Does the fast-track system of extradition operate in the interest of the British public?

6 88 6
Thur 09/11/2006

David Cameron is to set out his plans to control economic migration.  Mr Cameron has asked for a "calm and serious" approach in the foreword to the report by home secretary David Davis and immigration spokesman Damien Green.

Expecting immigrant numbers to rise, the report will propose limiting access to skilled workers.   Mr Cameron adds, provision must be made for adequate public services and housing. 

Home Secretary John Reid announced limits on the number of Bulgarians and Romanians coming to work in the UK, after joining the EU in January.

Conservative propose having separate asylum and economic migration policy.  Mr Cameron calls for a border force to enforce policy and deal with over-stayers and illegal workers.

"These effects include the ability of the public services and infrastructure to cope with new arrivals at both national and local levels, the environmental impact of a rapidly rising population and the potential effects on community cohesion," he says.

q.    Should we have tighter controls regarding migrant workers and asylum seekers?

79 18 3
Fri 10/11/2006

Following anger over the case of Craig Sweeney, Judges in England and Wales could be given greater discretion to decide the sentence tariffs for potentially dangerous criminals.  Sweeney was told he could be released after five years for kidnap and sexual assault.  The former Home Secretary David Blunkett introduced rules two years ago that allowed non-violent offenders to be automatically freed halfway through their sentences.

Judges ruled that those sentenced to life terms (apart from murder) the "tariff" of time they must serve is determined by halving the equivalent sentence. 

Sweeney's minimum tariff was set in accordance with Home Office rules.  His prison licence period for an attack on another child had run out just weeks before.  

Mr Reid said: "Courts should be rigorous in applying their powers to protect society against dangerous and violent criminals. "That is why we need to strengthen judges' hands so they have greater discretion to impose even tougher sentences on offenders they believe pose a very serious risk."

q.    Is the current system of sentencing operating in the best interest of the public?

4 96 0
Tue 14/11/2006

Compensation is to be paid to former prisoners because they were forced to stop taking drugs in jail.

DrugScope a drugs charity said 198 former inmates who used heroin were about to settle out of court with the Prison Service after suing the Home Office.

The former inmates allege the "cold turkey" withdrawal treatment they were forced to undergo amounted to assault.

David Davis the Shadow home secretary said the case set a "disastrous" precedent and accused Home Secretary John Reid of failing to protect the public.

"Drugs are a scourge on society and completely undermine all our other efforts to fight crime. By doing this Mr Reid would be letting down the taxpayer, the victims of these offenders and the drug addicts themselves. The precedent would be disastrous.

"Former Conservative prisons minister Ann Widdecombe said the settlement was "an insult to every victim and every law abiding person".

The former inmates are suing under the European Convention on Human Rights.

q.    Should we move away from the European Convention on Human Rights?

89 9 2
Wed 15/11/2006

Parents of children displaying anti-social behaviour could face fines of £100.  Home Secretary John Reid has also announced that homeowners could be evicted for anti-social behaviour, excessive noise or the intimidation of neighbours. 

Mr Reid has said he will put "victims' needs first" by imposing "clear and tough" punishments.  Mr Reid announced the measures at the launch of a consultation to deal with anti-social behaviour.  Mr Reid wants to make parents liable for fines imposed on under-16s who breach acceptable behaviour.   The Home Office has announced that the top rate for some existing on-the-spot Fixed Penalty Notice fines will increase from £80 to £100.  Mr Reid said: "Some people will complain that what we want to do... impinges on people's rights.  "But communities have rights too, and the rights of individuals don't entitle them to cause mayhem for locals."

q.    Should the parents of anti-social children have to pay?

71 27 2
Thur 16/11/2006

A legally binding target to reduce long-term carbon dioxide emissions by 60% by the year 2050 has been set. The bill will establish a "Carbon Committee" to make sure targets are met.  However the bill makes no reference to annual CO2 reductions targets.  Opposition parties and environmentalists deem CO2 reductions necessary to tackle global warming. 

The Queen told MPs and peers: "My government will publish a bill on climate change as part of its policy to protect the environment, consistent with the need to secure long-term energy supplies."

David Cameron said he was delighted to hear the proposals in the Queen's Speech.  "I hope it will be a proper bill and not a watered down bill.  Government has got to give a lead by setting a proper framework."  That must mean an independent body with annual targets and an annual report from government on its progress."

The prime minister responded by pointing out that the UK was set to lose about 15% of its electricity generation capacity as existing nuclear power plants reached the end of their operating lives.

"We need to put nuclear power back on the agenda and at least replace the nuclear energy we will lose.  Without it, we will not be able to meet either our objectives on climate change or our objectives on energy security."

q.    Should we invest in new nuclear power stations?

84 16 0
Fri 17/11/2006

MPs are concerned that UK sovereignty is under threat if the European Commission's plan to abolish Britain's power of veto on crime policies goes ahead.

The European scrutiny committee has asked for a debate on whether member states are to give up their veto on police and judicial matters.

The loss of veto could affect the legal principle of a person being innocent until proven guilty.

Today judicial policy must be agreed unanimously by all 25 states.

The commission wants to replace the current system with one weighted according to countries' size under which no individual state holds a veto.

The proposed system would give the European Court of Justice further powers of jurisdiction and give the European Parliament a say on issues such as the definition of what constitutes a crime.

If Britain retained its veto, the committee said it could lead to the UK being excluded from future EU negotiations on crime.

Committee chairman Michael Connarty said "If it goes ahead then we would see the present certainty about our ability to protect Britain's interests in important justice matters replaced with uncertainty."

q.    Should Britain block this move to take away our power of veto?

94 5 1
Mon 20/11/2006

There are those who argue that the English should sing an English, not British, anthem.  They believe God Save the Queen should continue to be the British anthem, to be sung as a celebration of Britishness or the monarch, by the individual nations of Britain, or by the English, Scots, Welsh and Irish when they are gathered together as Brits.
Scottish and English teams line up together with the Scots singing a Scottish anthem and the English singing a British anthem.

It is felt by some that it may be politically convenient for the UK Government to encourage Scottishness and Welshness whilst keeping Britishness to the fore in England.   Scots and Welsh that still consider themselves British may be obliged to boo their own anthem for fear of being regarded as traitors by an increasingly nationalistic tendency.


I'm surprised English sports teams don't sing Land Of Hope And Glory instead.   Princess Anne

 

q.    Does England require a new anthem?

86 13 1
Wed 22/11/2006

The prime minister's Respect Task Force is to fund 70 child psychologists dubbed "super nannies".  The super nannies are to target bad behaviour hot spots around the UK. 

The move comes after the Institute for Public Policy Research carried out a survey in which the UK's children were found to be the worst behaved in Europe.   

A Mori poll showed that 53% of people blame poor parenting as the main cause of bad behaviour and 85% blamed parents for allowing children to become out of control.  The chief executive of the children's charity NCH, Clare Tickell, said the move was "good news" but that more could be done.

 

q.    Do you believe that a super nanny is a viable alternative to strong discipline, when dealing with out of control youths?

27 69 4
Thur 23/11/2006

John Hutton the Work and Pensions Secretary, is to warn that the retirement age has to be raised to avoid shifting the tax burden onto future generations. 

Mr Hutton will announce in his speech, that the age of retirement is to be raised to 68 over the next 40 years to avoid a 4p rise in income tax.

The new measures aimed at covering the cost of future state pensions will be included in a bill of reforms published next week.

The basic state pension is to be re-linked  to earnings within the next parliament and number of years it takes to build a full basic state pension is to be cut, from 44 years for men and 39 years for women to 30 years for everyone.

Mr Hutton is to say: "As unpopular as it may be to talk about working longer - the simple fact is that if we aren't prepared to increase the state pension age, we will simply pass an ever greater and frankly unsustainable burden on to our children and grandchildren."

He adds that those who oppose the bill: "are in effect arguing for more than a 4p rise in the basic rate of income tax to pay for a population spending more and more of their lives in retirement."

q.   Would you prefer to work up to the age of 68 rather than having to pay more tax to cover your state pension?

22 64 14
Fri 24/11/2006

A vote is to be held in early 2007 asking MP's whether the Trident nuclear weapons system should be replaced.  The Trident system is due to go out of service in 2024 and Ministers are to select a replacement after a three-month consultation. 

Commons leader Jack Straw said: "We have a responsibility not to cop out of this but to come to a decision, and we shall.  "We're talking about defence of the nation here, not the Shops Act or fox hunting." 

Mr Blair has said that Trident is an essential part of Britain's ability to defend itself.

With an estimated cost of up to £25bn, anti-nuclear campaigners say the money would be better spent elsewhere and they fear the government has already decided to go ahead with replacing Trident. 

Kate Hudson, chairman of CND said a white paper could "close down" the wider debate.

q.   Should we replace Trident when it goes out of service in 2024?

59 39 2
Mon 27/11/2006

It's just not cricket.

 

12 months ago the English cricket board awarded Sky the rights to show the Ashes in 2006.  If an Englishman wants to watch his national team defend their great achievement of last year, he must now pay for Sky Sports or catch glimpses of the match on the BBC's highlights program.  However the licence fee does go towards what seems to be an endless stream of reality TV shows.  This Sunday's Grandstand did show live International Rugby Union, but how long is it going to be before that goes to Sky also?  The other sport shown on this weeks Grandstand was Trampolining, is this what we have to look forward to after paying our licence fee?

Failure to pay for a TV licence is a criminal offence and you can receive a fine up to £1,000 or be sent to jail.  Even if you never watch the BBC , you must still pay the licence fee.  Being sent to jail may not be such a bad thing as you can sue the government for not allowing you to take Heroin while watching the Ashes on your Sky TV.  

q.   If you pay for a British TV licence, do you expect to be able to view British international sport?

63 37 0
Tue 28/11/2006

The Conservatives plan to introduce a new tax on businesses, which they are calling the "carbon levy."

Shadow chancellor George Osborne told the CBI conference that he plans to increase the money collected from businesses by the carbon levy, but promises that this will be offset by reductions in other business taxes: "that is a guarantee."

Mr Osborne said: "The chancellor decided to increase National Insurance and at the same time reduce the proportion of taxes collected by green taxes.  We want to go in the opposite direction." 

The shadow chancellor told the CBI conference that the conservatives were not becoming "anti-business".

"For too long my party abandoned issues like the environment, flexible working, and social responsibility to our opponents on the left.  So I make absolutely no apology that we have been talking about the new business agenda."  

q.   Is there any point increasing the Carbon Levy, if the businesses involved are to receive reductions in other taxes to compensate?

23 66 11
Wed 29/11/2006

Following politicians in Italy calling for a ban on Muslim women wearing face-covering veils in public places, one in three people questioned in a survey carried out by the ICM would support a similar ban.  Dutch ministers have also said they will legislate against the all-over burqa.

Of those questioned 61 per cent said they would approve of a ban in airports and at passport control, While 53 per cent supported a ban in courtrooms and schools. 

Only Forty-one per cent of the survey participants said they would support a ban on veils in the workplace.

When questioned on wearing veils while travelling on public transport 56 per cent said they would oppose a ban. 

Chief executive of the British Muslim Forum, Zareen Roohi Ahmed, told the BBC: "If security is at stake, such as at an airport, then yes, of course, the veil should be removed.  If it proves difficult in performing a task such as in a school, then it is up to the individual who is wearing the veil whether they want to work there or not." 

A Muslim classroom assistant suspended by a school in West Yorkshire for wearing a veil in lessons was sacked last week.

q.   Should the UK follow the example of Italy and ban the wearing of face-covering veils in public places?

46 48 6
Thur 30/11/2006

The BBC's documentary Evicted shown on BBC one last night was a heart wrenching eye opener.  Many of us are in some way aware that there is a shortage in family homes, but this documentary showed us what a devastating struggle it can be for a young family trying to find one. 

Since the year 2000 1.5 million families are waiting for a home on housing registers, a rise of almost 50%. 

Gary Porter is the housing spokesman for South Holland District Council in Lincolnshire, his council has recently built its first council houses in 25 years.

Gary said: "There were about 100 homes built by councils in Britain last year.  In the same period we had a housing shortage of 279 in South Holland alone.  The fact so few are built is down to lack of funds. Central government gives money for housing to the Housing Corporation, which distributes it to social housing landlords and housing associations. "But clearly this isn't working, they can't keep up with demand and the Housing Corporation costs £26m a year to run, money that could be spent on construction."

Alan Walter, chairman of campaign group Defend Council Housing, said: "The truth is council houses served generations of people well and, if given decent government funding, can do for future generations.  The job of building decent, affordable and accountable housing should be given to councils who have the experience, the local knowledge and are accountable to the tenants, not by multi-million pound businesses out to make a profit."

q.   Should the money provided by the government go directly to local councils enabling them to build cost effective housing for their homeless families?

63 25 12
         
         
         
         
         
         
 

© Copyright 2006 dailyreferendum.co.uk