|
DATE |
QUESTION |
YES% |
NO% |
DO NOT KNOW% |
| Wed
01/11/2006 |
Professor Bob Hepple QC, chairman of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics is asking
the public whether people not convicted of crime should have their details
stored on the national DNA database.
Professor Alec Jeffreys the inventor of DNA fingerprinting is concerned that his
invention is not being used in the interest of the public. Along with civil
liberties groups Professor Jeffreys believes that innocent people should have
their details removed from the DNA database. However victims’ support groups
believe that innocent people have nothing to fear.
Prof Hepple said the main question was whether the UK would "become instead of a
nation of citizens, a nation of suspects".
q.
Should innocent people have
their details removed from the DNA database? |
76 |
19 |
5 |
| Thur
02/11/2006 |
The government's Information
Commissioner Richard Thomas has said Britain is "waking up to a
surveillance society that is already all around us,". The
Commissioner’s report points out that the UK currently has 4.2
million Closed Circuit TV cameras in operation. These CCTV
cameras are monitoring everything from our work rate, to our
shopping habits and movements.
The report adds that surveillance is
set to increase in the near future. Dr David Murakami-Wood
the report's co-writer has said the UK was "the most surveilled
country". While surveillance could help fight terrorism
and crime, it could "intrude into our private space", he added.
q.
Should
there be tighter controls on the implementation of surveillance
systems? |
81 |
13 |
6 |
| Fri
03/11/2006 |
The UK fisheries minister Ben Bradshaw has said
Britain's fish stocks could be virtually wiped out by 2048,
Scientists issued the warning on Thursday, which they
say represents the biggest global environment challenge after global warming.
The UK fisheries minister ruled out a
complete ban on cod fishing, saying a "zero catch" could mean
"the end of all fishing in the UK"
Greenpeace campaigner Willie Mackenzie
said fish and chips would be off the menu "within our lifetime"
if action was not taken now to tackle the problem.
q.
Should
there be tighter controls on
the fishing of British waters by our neighbours? |
68 |
23 |
9 |
| Sat
04/11/2006 |
A recent BBC poll suggests that most people in
north-east England now support some form of devolved power for the region.
Two years ago to the day, more than three-quarters of voters in a referendum
rejected the government's plans for an elected regional assembly.
In a poll for the BBC's Politics Show, 69 per
cent of 750 adults surveyed in the area said they would like local
control on issues such as transport. However after the 2004 vote,
more referendums on devolution are unlikely.
75 per cent of those who responded to the Mori
poll for the Politics Show felt the North East was worse off than
London, both financially and in how well it is represented in
government. More than half of the respondents said they did not
get their fair share of national spending.
q.
Should
there be referenda on devolved power and regional assemblies? |
57 |
39 |
4 |
| Mon
06/11/2006 |
Stern Review on the
Economics of Climate Change.
"There is still time to avoid the worst impacts of climate
change, if we take strong action now". -
Sir Nicholas Stern
The Stern review utilises the
Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (2001), along with more recent scientific
studies.
The review claims that the
evidence is now overwhelming: climate change is a serious
global threat, and it demands an urgent global response.
Utilising data provided by
formal economic models, the Review estimates that if action
is not taken, the cost of climate change will be equivalent
to losing at least 5% of global GDP (Gross Domestic Product)
each year. If a wider range of risks is taken into
account, the estimates could rise to 20% of GDP.
However reducing greenhouse
gas emissions would limit the impact to around 1% of global
GDP each
year.
Martin
Livermore of the Scientific Alliance claims: The billions
which this review says it is necessary to spend are likely
to have little positive effect, and could be put to much
better use in helping the world's poorest people to create
better lives for themselves.
q.
Do
you think that the Stern Report is a reasonable assessment
of the risks posed by Climate Change? |
17 |
64 |
19 |
| Tue
07/11/2006 |
English Parliament.
Devolution has created a United
Kingdom in which Scotland and Wales have national executives
while England does not.
The Scottish Parliament has full
executive powers independent of the UK in 75% of governance
matters. No English MP has any voice at all in such matters
as they affect Scotland.
Scottish MPs can both initiate and
vote on Acts of Parliament concerning education and the NHS
in England.
Constitutionally there are three
sorts of people in the island of Great Britain. There are
those who are Scottish and British, those who are Welsh and
British and those who are just British.
At the moment there is no voice for
England in any of the various institutions that help shape
EU policy, the conduct of EU business, or the awarding of EU
grants.
“There’s a possibility that a
Scotsman is going to rule over me. A Scotsman who comes from
a constituency where my member of parliament, who I elected,
has no say whatsoever.” Sir Michael
Caine
q.
Should
there be an English parliament? |
92 |
7 |
1 |
| Wed
08/11/2006 |
Opposition peers have
backed down in their fight to stop "fast-track" extraditions to the US.
Claiming the current system was unfair, they argued it was easier for the US to
extradite Britons than vice-versa. This means that the US remains on the
list of countries that do not need "prima facie" evidence to extradite from the
UK.
Home
Secretary John Reid called the decision a "strong message in
support of justice". Mr Reid added - "This will bring
real benefits to British victims of crime and help ensure
that serious criminals will not be able to escape justice by
hiding abroad."
The
Liberal Democrats were fighting to re-instate a clause that
ensured extradition to the US could not take place unless a
judge deemed it to be "in the interest of justice" for the
trial to take place abroad.
Without Conservative support the Liberal Democrat's proposal
was defeated by 96 votes to 174.
The
proposal followed controversy over the extradition of three
UK bankers - the "NatWest Three" to the US on fraud charges.
q.
Does
the fast-track
system of extradition operate in the interest of the British
public? |
6 |
88 |
6 |
| Thur
09/11/2006 |
David Cameron is to set out his plans
to control economic migration. Mr Cameron has asked for a "calm and
serious" approach in the foreword to the report by home secretary David Davis
and immigration spokesman Damien Green.
Expecting immigrant numbers to rise,
the report will propose limiting access to skilled workers. Mr
Cameron adds, provision must be made for adequate public services and housing.
Home Secretary John Reid announced
limits on the number of Bulgarians and Romanians coming to work in the UK, after
joining the EU in January.
Conservative propose having separate
asylum and economic migration policy. Mr Cameron calls for a border force
to enforce policy and deal with over-stayers and illegal workers.
"These effects include the ability of
the public services and infrastructure to cope with new arrivals at both
national and local levels, the environmental impact of a rapidly rising
population and the potential effects on community cohesion," he says.
q.
Should
we have tighter controls regarding migrant workers and
asylum seekers? |
79 |
18 |
3 |
| Fri 10/11/2006 |
Following anger over the case of Craig
Sweeney, Judges in England and Wales could be given greater discretion to decide
the sentence tariffs for potentially dangerous criminals. Sweeney was told
he could be released after five years for kidnap and sexual assault. The
former Home Secretary David Blunkett introduced rules two years ago that allowed
non-violent offenders to be automatically freed halfway through their sentences.
Judges ruled that those sentenced to
life terms (apart from murder) the "tariff" of time they must serve is
determined by halving the equivalent sentence.
Sweeney's minimum tariff was set in
accordance with Home Office rules. His prison licence period for an attack
on another child had run out just weeks before.
Mr Reid said: "Courts should be
rigorous in applying their powers to protect society against dangerous and
violent criminals. "That is why we need to strengthen judges' hands so they have
greater discretion to impose even tougher sentences on offenders they believe
pose a very serious risk."
q.
Is the current system of
sentencing
operating in the best interest of the public? |
4 |
96 |
0 |
| Tue 14/11/2006 |
Compensation is to be paid to former
prisoners because they were forced to stop taking drugs in jail.
DrugScope a drugs charity said 198
former inmates who used heroin were about to settle out of court with the Prison
Service after suing the Home Office.
The former inmates allege the "cold
turkey" withdrawal treatment they were forced to
undergo amounted to assault.
David Davis the Shadow home secretary
said the case set a "disastrous" precedent and accused Home Secretary John Reid
of failing to protect the public.
"Drugs are a scourge on society and
completely undermine all our other efforts to fight crime. By doing this Mr Reid
would be letting down the taxpayer, the victims of these offenders and the drug
addicts themselves. The precedent would be disastrous.
"Former Conservative prisons minister
Ann Widdecombe said the settlement was "an insult to every victim and every law
abiding person".
The former inmates are suing under the
European Convention on Human Rights.
q.
Should
we move away from the European Convention on Human Rights?
|
89 |
9 |
2 |
| Wed 15/11/2006 |
Parents of children displaying
anti-social behaviour could face fines of £100. Home Secretary John Reid
has also announced that homeowners could be evicted for anti-social behaviour,
excessive noise or the intimidation of neighbours.
Mr Reid has said he will put "victims'
needs first" by imposing "clear and tough" punishments. Mr Reid announced
the measures at the launch of a consultation to deal with anti-social behaviour.
Mr Reid wants to make parents liable for fines imposed on under-16s who breach
acceptable behaviour. The Home Office has announced that the top
rate for some existing on-the-spot Fixed Penalty Notice fines will increase from
£80 to £100. Mr Reid said: "Some people will complain that what we want to
do... impinges on people's rights. "But communities have rights too, and
the rights of individuals don't entitle them to cause mayhem for locals."
q.
Should the parents of
anti-social
children have to pay?
|
71 |
27 |
2 |
| Thur 16/11/2006 |
A legally binding target to reduce
long-term carbon dioxide emissions by 60% by the year 2050 has been set. The
bill will establish a "Carbon Committee" to make sure targets are met.
However the bill makes no reference to annual CO2 reductions targets.
Opposition parties and environmentalists deem CO2 reductions necessary to tackle
global warming.
The Queen told MPs and peers: "My
government will publish a bill on climate change as part of its policy to
protect the environment, consistent with the need to secure long-term energy
supplies."
David Cameron said he was delighted to
hear the proposals in the Queen's Speech. "I hope it will be a proper bill
and not a watered down bill. Government has got to give a lead by setting
a proper framework." That must mean an independent body with annual
targets and an annual report from government on its progress."
The prime minister responded by
pointing out that the UK was set to lose about 15% of its electricity generation
capacity as existing nuclear power plants reached the end of their operating
lives.
"We need to put nuclear power back on
the agenda and at least replace the nuclear energy we will lose. Without
it, we will not be able to meet either our objectives on climate change or our
objectives on energy security."
q.
Should
we invest in new nuclear power stations?
|
84 |
16 |
0 |
| Fri 17/11/2006 |
MPs are concerned that UK sovereignty
is under threat if the European Commission's plan to abolish Britain's power of
veto on crime policies goes ahead.
The European scrutiny committee has
asked for a debate on whether member states are to give up their veto on police
and judicial matters.
The loss of veto could affect the legal
principle of a person being innocent until proven guilty.
Today judicial policy must be agreed
unanimously by all 25 states.
The commission wants to replace the
current system with one weighted according to countries' size under which no
individual state holds a veto.
The proposed system would give the
European Court of Justice further powers of jurisdiction and give the European
Parliament a say on issues such as the definition of what constitutes a crime.
If Britain retained its veto, the
committee said it could lead to the UK being excluded from future EU
negotiations on crime.
Committee chairman Michael Connarty
said "If it goes ahead then we would see the present certainty about our ability
to protect Britain's interests in important justice matters replaced with
uncertainty."
q.
Should
Britain block this move to take away our power of veto?
|
94 |
5 |
1 |
| Mon 20/11/2006 |
There are those who argue that the
English should sing an English, not British, anthem. They believe God Save
the Queen should continue to be the British anthem, to be sung as a celebration
of Britishness or the monarch, by the individual nations of Britain, or by the
English, Scots, Welsh and Irish when they are gathered together as Brits.
Scottish and English teams line up together with the Scots
singing a Scottish anthem and the English singing a British anthem.
It is felt by some that it may be
politically convenient for the UK Government to encourage Scottishness and
Welshness whilst keeping Britishness to the fore in England. Scots
and Welsh that still consider themselves British may be obliged to boo their own
anthem for fear of being regarded as traitors by an increasingly nationalistic
tendency.
I'm surprised English sports teams don't sing Land Of Hope
And Glory instead.
Princess Anne
q.
Does
England require a new anthem?
|
86 |
13 |
1 |
| Wed 22/11/2006 |
The prime minister's Respect Task Force
is to fund 70 child psychologists dubbed "super nannies".
The super nannies are to target bad behaviour hot spots
around the UK.
The move comes after the Institute for
Public Policy Research carried out a survey in which the UK's children were
found to be the worst behaved in Europe.
A Mori poll showed that 53% of people
blame poor parenting as the main cause of bad behaviour and 85% blamed parents
for allowing children to become out of control. The chief executive of the
children's charity NCH, Clare Tickell, said the move was "good news" but that
more could be done.
q.
Do
you believe that a super nanny is a viable alternative to strong
discipline, when dealing with out of control youths?
|
27 |
69 |
4 |
|
Thur 23/11/2006 |
John Hutton the Work and Pensions
Secretary, is to warn that the retirement age has to be raised to avoid shifting
the tax burden onto future generations.
Mr Hutton will announce in his speech,
that the age of retirement is to be raised to 68 over the next 40 years to avoid
a 4p rise in income tax.
The new measures aimed at covering the
cost of future state pensions will be included in a bill of reforms published
next week.
The basic state pension is to be
re-linked to earnings within the next parliament and number of years it
takes to build a full basic state pension is to be cut, from 44 years for men
and 39 years for women to 30 years for everyone.
Mr Hutton is to say: "As unpopular as
it may be to talk about working longer - the simple fact is that if we aren't
prepared to increase the state pension age, we will simply pass an ever greater
and frankly unsustainable burden on to our children and grandchildren."
He adds that those who oppose the bill:
"are in effect arguing for more than a 4p rise in the basic rate of income tax
to pay for a population spending more and more of their lives in retirement."
q.
Would you prefer to work up to the age of
68 rather than having to pay more tax to cover your state pension?
|
22 |
64 |
14 |
|
Fri 24/11/2006 |
A vote is to be held in early 2007
asking MP's whether the Trident nuclear weapons system should be replaced.
The Trident system is due to go out of service in 2024 and Ministers are to
select a replacement after a three-month consultation.
Commons leader Jack Straw said:
"We have a responsibility not to cop out of this but to come to a decision, and
we shall. "We're talking about defence of the nation here, not the Shops
Act or fox hunting."
Mr Blair has said that Trident is an
essential part of Britain's ability to defend itself.
With an estimated cost of up to £25bn,
anti-nuclear campaigners say the money would be better spent elsewhere and they
fear the government has already decided to go ahead with replacing Trident.
Kate Hudson, chairman of CND said a
white paper could "close down" the wider debate.
q.
Should we replace Trident when it goes
out of service in 2024?
|
59 |
39 |
2 |
|
Mon 27/11/2006 |
It's just not cricket.
12 months ago the English cricket board
awarded Sky the rights to show the Ashes in 2006. If an Englishman wants
to watch his national team defend their great achievement of last year, he must
now pay for Sky Sports or catch glimpses of the match on the BBC's highlights
program. However the licence fee does go towards what seems to be an
endless stream of reality TV shows. This Sunday's Grandstand did show live
International Rugby Union, but how long is it going to be before that goes to
Sky also? The other sport shown on this weeks Grandstand was Trampolining,
is this what we have to look forward to after paying our licence fee?
Failure to pay for a TV licence is a
criminal offence and you can receive a fine up to £1,000 or be sent to jail.
Even if you never watch the BBC , you must still pay the licence fee.
Being sent to jail may not be such a bad thing as you can sue the government for
not allowing you to take Heroin while watching the Ashes on your Sky TV.
q.
If you pay for a British TV licence, do
you expect to be able to view British international sport?
|
63 |
37 |
0 |
|
Tue 28/11/2006 |
The Conservatives plan to introduce a
new tax on businesses, which they are calling the "carbon levy."
Shadow chancellor George Osborne told
the CBI conference that he plans to increase the money collected from businesses
by the carbon levy, but promises that this will be offset by reductions in other
business taxes: "that is a guarantee."
Mr Osborne said: "The chancellor
decided to increase National Insurance and at the same time reduce the
proportion of taxes collected by green taxes. We want to go in the
opposite direction."
The shadow chancellor told the CBI
conference that the conservatives were not becoming "anti-business".
"For too long my party abandoned issues
like the environment, flexible working, and social responsibility to our
opponents on the left. So I make absolutely no apology that we have been
talking about the new business agenda."
q.
Is there any point increasing the Carbon
Levy, if the businesses involved are to receive reductions in other
taxes to compensate?
|
23 |
66 |
11 |
|
Wed 29/11/2006 |
Following politicians in Italy calling
for a ban on Muslim women wearing face-covering veils in public places, one in
three people questioned in a survey carried out by the ICM
would support a similar ban. Dutch ministers have also said they will
legislate against the all-over burqa.
Of those questioned 61 per cent said
they would approve of a ban in airports and at passport control, While 53 per
cent supported a ban in courtrooms and schools.
Only Forty-one per cent of the survey
participants said they would support a ban on veils in the workplace.
When questioned on wearing veils while
travelling on public transport 56 per cent said they would oppose a ban.
Chief executive of the British Muslim
Forum, Zareen Roohi Ahmed, told the BBC: "If security is at stake, such as at an
airport, then yes, of course, the veil should be removed. If it proves
difficult in performing a task such as in a school, then it is up to the
individual who is wearing the veil whether they want to work there or not."
A Muslim classroom assistant suspended
by a school in West Yorkshire for wearing a veil in lessons was sacked last
week.
q.
Should the UK follow the example of Italy
and ban the wearing of face-covering veils in public places?
|
46 |
48 |
6 |
|
Thur 30/11/2006 |
The BBC's documentary Evicted shown on
BBC one last night was a heart wrenching eye opener. Many of us are in
some way aware that there is a shortage in family homes, but this documentary
showed us what a devastating struggle it can be for a young family trying to
find one.
Since the year 2000 1.5 million
families are waiting for a home on housing registers, a rise of almost 50%.
Gary Porter is the housing spokesman
for South Holland District Council in Lincolnshire, his council has recently
built its first council houses in 25 years.
Gary said: "There were about 100 homes
built by councils in Britain last year. In the same period we had a
housing shortage of 279 in South Holland alone. The fact so few are built
is down to lack of funds. Central government gives money for housing to the
Housing Corporation, which distributes it to social housing landlords and
housing associations. "But clearly this isn't working, they can't keep up with
demand and the Housing Corporation costs £26m a year to run, money that could be
spent on construction."
Alan Walter, chairman of campaign group
Defend Council Housing, said: "The truth is council houses served generations of
people well and, if given decent government funding, can do for future
generations. The job of building decent, affordable and accountable
housing should be given to councils who have the experience, the local knowledge
and are accountable to the tenants, not by multi-million pound businesses out to
make a profit."
q.
Should the money provided by the
government go directly to local councils enabling them to build cost
effective housing for their homeless families?
|
63 |
25 |
12 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|